Re: [linux-pm] cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP]

[Vitaly Wool]

Pavel,

On 9/12/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Can we at least try adding that, before deciding cpufreq is unsuitable
> and starting new interface? I do not think issues are nearly as big as
> you think.. (at user<->kernel interface level, anyway; you'll need big
> changes under the hood).

who talks about user <-> kernel interface level changes at the moment?!

Vitaly
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/