Re: [PATCH] watchdog: add support for w83697hg chip

From: Evgeniy Polyakov
Date: Mon Sep 11 2006 - 01:49:05 EST


Hello.

On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 10:02:56PM +0400, Sergey Vlasov (vsu@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> I can find at least two attempts to fix the SuperIO problem:
>
> - a SuperIO subsystem proposed by Evgeniy Polyakov (cc'd);
>
> - a simple SuperIO locks coordinator proposed by Jim Cromie (also
> cc'd; http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.sensors/10052 -
> can't find actual patches).
>
> However, the mainline kernel still does not have anything for proper
> SuperIO access locking.

I created SuperIO subsystem for soekris board initially.
Later it was extended to support scx200/scx100 gpio (for w1 subsytem).
There is support for acb(i2c) bus, GPIO, and some stub for other
elements in pc8736x superIO chip.
But I was told those days (about at least 1.5 years ago) in lm_sensors
mail list that splitting all that functionality into separated modules
is the way to go.

As far as I recall pc8736x GPIO was added recently.

Here is one of the implementations posted to lm_sensors@:
http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg27895.html

And here is my drawing board with image of how it looks (just for pure
interest) in my mind :) :
http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/old/?section=gallery&item=superio_design

--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/