Re: [PATCH RFC]: New termios take 2

[Alan Cox]

Ar Sul, 2006-09-10 am 12:20 +0100, ysgrifennodd David Woodhouse:
> But I don't think it's realistic to suggest that C libraries should be
> built without access to our asm/term{bit,io}s.h at all. However, I'm
> only really responsible for the new export _mechanism_ -- I'm not going
> to impose policy except when people like Andi do stupid things and
> sneakily send private patches to undo fixes I've already made.

glibc needs them, nobody else does.

The point I was trying to make is that user space (except glibc) does
not use them. glibc presents a different struct termios to them already,
and it always includes c_ispeed/c_ospeed.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/