Re: [PATCH 0/7] Permit filesystem local caching and NFS superblock sharing [try #13]

[David Howells]

Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Trond merged the large nfs-affecting ones; I don't know if he intends to
> handle the non-nfs bulk of the work though.

There is one large NFS affecting patch left: namely the one that makes NFS use
FS-Cache.  I presume that requires Trond's agreement to merge.

> Your CONFIG_BLOCK patches did a decent job of trashing your
> fs-cache-make-kafs-* patches, btw.  What's up with that?  OK, it's sensible
> for people to work against mainline but the net effect of doing that is to
> create a mess for other people to clean up.

Hmmm...  Jens wanted my block patches against his tree; you wanted my NFS
patches against Trond's NFS tree.  I guess I should try stacking the whole
lot, but against what?  And who carries the fixes?  A patch to fix this
problem may well only apply to a tree that's the conjunction of both:-/

> If Christoph acks them then I can send them to Trond or Linus, at Trond's
> option.
> 
> Or I can butt out, drop the patches, wait for them to turn up in Trond's
> tree, at your option.

Trond, Christoph?  Any thoughts?


David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/