Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Aug 29 2006 - 13:38:02 EST


On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:56:54 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> While I'm sure it's an interesting intellectual exercise to do these
> advanced rwsems it would be better for everybody else to go for a single
> maintainable C implementation.

metoo. It's irritating having multiple implementations around, never being
sure which version people are running with.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/