Re: Linux v2.6.18-rc5

From: Nathan Lynch
Date: Tue Aug 29 2006 - 09:03:44 EST


Hi Olaf-

Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > Pls test it out, and please remind all the appropriate people about any
> > regressions you find (including any found earlier if they haven't been
> > addressed yet).
>
> > Nathan Lynch:
> > [POWERPC] Fix gettimeofday inaccuracies
>
> Tested on B&W G3, iBook1 and a G4/466.
> This patch causes deadlocks on ppc32, but not on ppc64. Have to verify
> it on a vanilla kernel, but I'm sure there are no funky patches in
> openSuSE.
>
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202146

Sorry about that, does this (a partial revert of the change) fix it
for you?


diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
index 18e59e4..fe9b1d9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
@@ -655,7 +655,6 @@ void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs * re
int next_dec;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
unsigned long ticks;
- u64 tb_next_jiffy;

#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
if (atomic_read(&ppc_n_lost_interrupts) != 0)
@@ -697,14 +696,11 @@ void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs * re
continue;

write_seqlock(&xtime_lock);
- tb_next_jiffy = tb_last_jiffy + tb_ticks_per_jiffy;
- if (per_cpu(last_jiffy, cpu) >= tb_next_jiffy) {
- tb_last_jiffy = tb_next_jiffy;
- tb_last_stamp = per_cpu(last_jiffy, cpu);
- do_timer(regs);
- timer_recalc_offset(tb_last_jiffy);
- timer_check_rtc();
- }
+ tb_last_jiffy += tb_ticks_per_jiffy;
+ tb_last_stamp = per_cpu(last_jiffy, cpu);
+ do_timer(regs);
+ timer_recalc_offset(tb_last_jiffy);
+ timer_check_rtc();
write_sequnlock(&xtime_lock);
}

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/