Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

[Oleg Verych]

Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:11:42PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > I've tested this with the aic94xx driver using the new MODULE_FIRMWARE()
> > tag.  Initramfs should be much easier because it already includes most
> > of the boot time loading; all it has to do is the piece identifying the
> > firmware for the selected modules.
...
> Notice that mkinitrd-tools is dead, and will probably be removed from etch.
request_firmware() is dead also.
YMMV, but three years, and there are still big chunks of binary in kernel.
And please don't add new useless info _in_ it.

Nobody cares.
While this implementation exists, it wasn't well designed and hard to use.
As with in-kernel bootsplash and i18n, everything maybe done in userspace, only
with little help from the kernel:
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/435955>.

Thanks.

--
-o--=O`C  /. .\   (+)
 #oo'L O      o    |
<___=E M    ^--    |  (you're barking up the wrong tree)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/