Re: [take14 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

[Jari Sundell]

On 8/28/06, Nicholas Miell <nmiell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Also complicated is the case where waiting threads have different
> priorities, different timeouts, and different minimum event counts --
> how do you decide which thread gets events first? What if the decisions
> are different depending on whether you want to maximize throughput or
> interactivity?

BTW, what is the intended use of the min event count parameter? The
obvious reason I can see, avoiding waking up a thread too often with
few queued events, would imo be handled cleaner by just passing a
parameter telling the kernel to try to queue more events.

With a min event count you'd have to use a rather low timeout to
ensure that events get handled within a resonable time.

Rakshasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/