Re: Conversion to generic boolean

[Jesper Juhl]

On 28/08/06, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 05:24:42AM +0200, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Just would like to ask if you want patches for:
>
> Total NACK to any of this boolean ididocy.  I very much hope you didn't
> get the impression you actually have a chance to get this merged.
>
> >
> > * (Most importent, may introduce bugs if left alone)
> > Fixing boolean checking, ex:
> > if (bool == FALSE)
> > to
> > if (!bool)
>
> this one of course makes sense, but please do it without introducing
> any boolean type.  Getting rid of all the TRUE/FALSE defines and converting
> all scsi drivers to classic C integer as boolean semantics would be
> very welcome janitorial work.
If you'll take such patches I'd be willing to clean up a few drivers..
Any specific ones you'd like me to start with?

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/