Re: Updated libata acpi patches for GIT HEAD

From: Randy.Dunlap
Date: Sun Aug 27 2006 - 17:59:41 EST


On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:50:32 +0200 Thomas Glanzmann wrote:

> Hello Randy,

Hi,
Please use rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx or randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx now.

> I have a T60 and use your libata acpi patch which saves/restores the
> taskfile of the disk on hibernation and resume. I wonder if you have an
> updated patch for GIT HEAD because a colleague with a similar notebook
> has to use GIT HEAD to get his soundcard supported. I tried to port it
> myself and there was only one reject which I maybe fixed, but I don't
> intend to try the patch so I don't know:

I don't have a suitable machine for testing.
Forrest Zhao at Intel was picking up continuing work on this patch.

Someone else did a patch update and put that function call in
ata_bus_probe(). See
http://vizzzion.org/stuff/thinkpad-t60/libata-acpi.diff


> @@ -4290,6 +4294,7 @@ int ata_device_resume(struct ata_port *a
> }
> if (!ata_dev_present(dev))
> return 0;
> + ata_acpi_exec_tfs(ap);
> if (dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATA)
> ata_start_drive(ap, dev);
>
> in libata-core.c. This function ata_device_resume does no longer exist in GIT
> HEAD, so I modified the following function ata_scsi_device_resume instead:
>
> diff -ruN linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c 2006-08-27 20:01:34.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c 2006-08-27 23:13:00.000000000 +0200
> @@ -499,6 +499,8 @@
> sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_CANCEL || sdev->sdev_state == SDEV_DEL)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> + ata_acpi_exec_tfs(ap);
> +
> /* request resume */
> action = ATA_EH_RESUME;
> if (sdev->sdev_gendev.power.power_state.event == PM_EVENT_SUSPEND)


---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/