Re: [uml-devel] arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S: useless #ifdef _REGPARM's?

[Blaisorblade]

On Monday 21 August 2006 23:56, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> arch/um/sys-i386/setjmp.S contains two #ifdef _REGPARM's.
>
> Even if regparm was used in i386 uml (which isn't currently done (why?)),
> I don't see _REGPARM being defined anywhere.
>
> Is this a bug waiting for happening when regparm will be used on uml or
> do I miss anything?
Can anybody explain me how can we use REGPARM if we have to link with host 
glibc?
If we are going to use klibc instead of glibc that's ok (and this is not the 
case I'm talking about), but I do not know that plan (and nobody discussed 
the implications).
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! 
 http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/