Re: [RFC] maximum latency tracking infrastructure (version 2)

[Daniel Walker]

On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 21:26 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > 
> > The name space here is bugging me a little. Maybe prefix them with
> > "pm_latency" so you'd have "pm_latency_set_acceptable()" ,
> > "pm_latency_modify_acceptable()" , something like that. Likewise with
> > the file names , "include/linux/pm_latency.h"
> > 
> 
> there is no reason why this should JUST be about power management....

I'm just suggesting it would be nice to have a clear prefix on each
function. It's up to you what that prefix is.

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/