Re: [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v2)

[Nick Piggin]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:49:15 +0400
> Kirill Korotaev <dev@xxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > > We need to go over this work before we can commit to the BC
> > > core.  Last time I looked at the VM accounting patch it
> > > seemed rather unpleasing from a maintainability POV.
> >
> > hmmm... in which regard?
>
>
> Little changes all over the MM code which might get accidentally broken.

I still think doing simple accounting per-page would be a better way to
go than trying to pin down all "user allocatable" kernel allocations.
And would require all of about 2 hooks in the page allocator. And would
track *actual* RAM allocated by that container.

Can we continue that discussion (ie. why it isn't good enough). Last I
was told it is not perfect and can be unfair... sounds like it fits the
semantics perfectly ;)

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/