Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc4-mm2] Generic boolean (was: Re: Generic booleansin -mm)

From: Jan Engelhardt
Date: Wed Aug 23 2006 - 08:07:36 EST


Hi,


> There has been concern about adding other values then 0 and 1. There has been
> ideas to do something like:
> bool b = i & 1 : 0;

I think you miseed a '?'

bool b = (i & 1) ? : 0;

> /*or*/
> bool b = !!i;
>
> but all that is needed is just a casting:
>
> bool b = (bool) i;

No casting needed (in fact, casting is more evil than !!). If bool is a
bool, then the compiler will (hopefully) ensure that b will only get
values valid for bools.

$ cat x.c
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main(int argc, const char **argv) {
_Bool b = argc;
printf("%d\n", (int)b);
return 0;
}
$ ./a.out
1



Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/