Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 3)

[ricknu-0]

Citerar Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> ricknu-0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > * changed back the version-checking when defining bool, this since I'm
> quite
> > sure Linux 2.4 and 2.6 share (if not all, then large part of) the drivers.
> And
> > 2.4 is still compiled with the 2.95 Gcc.
> 
> Drivers in 2.4 and 2.6 differ. We don't put 2.4-compatibility code into 
> 2.6. And the bool type won't get into 2.4.

It doesn't?! Good, that simplify it to only a:
typedef _Bool bool;
line. Did googled on it but did not find anything that comfirmed or denied it.
Thanks

> -- 
> Stefan Richter

/Richard Knutsson

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/