Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability

From: Olivier Galibert
Date: Fri Jul 07 2006 - 13:42:42 EST


On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:09:39PM +0200, grundig wrote:
> You may ask "why not merge suspend2", but from an objective
> POV it's perfectly fine that some people asks "why don't
> suspend2 people try to improve swsusp instead of rewritting
> it? It may be easier to fix swsusp than replacint it with
> suspend2"

Suspend2 is an improvement on swsusp. What Pavel wants is something
completely different and even less tested that suspend2 called
uswsusp.

OG.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/