Re: [KJ] [PATCH] fix legacy megaraid-driver to compile without CONFIG_PROC_FS

From: Henne
Date: Thu Jul 06 2006 - 16:30:50 EST


>> From: Henrik Kretzschmar <henne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Create an empty inline function to make the legacy megaraid-driver compile
>> without PROC_FS.
>> Signed-off-by: Henrik Kretzschmar <henne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> --- linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h 2006-06-18 03:49:35.000000000 +0200
>> +++ linux/drivers/scsi/megaraid.h 2006-07-06 21:39:59.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -1039,6 +1039,9 @@
>> static int proc_rdrv_30(char *, char **, off_t, int, int *, void *);
>> static int proc_rdrv_40(char *, char **, off_t, int, int *, void *);
>> static int proc_rdrv(adapter_t *, char *, int, int);
>> +#else
>> +static inline void
>> +mega_create_proc_entry(int index, struct proc_dir_entry *parent) {}
>> #endif
>>
>> static int mega_adapinq(adapter_t *, dma_addr_t);
>
> Already in -mm:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17/2.6.17-mm6/broken-out/drivers-scsi-megaraidc-add-a-dummy-mega_create_proc_entry-for-proc_fs=y.patch
Great, but isn't it better to put that define stuff into the headers?

Thanks and Greets,
Henne


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/