Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefinedreference to `__stack_chk_fail'

[H. Peter Anvin]

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > Does this mean that you don't want to see these fno-stack-protector
> > patches go into Andrew's tree?
>
> long term.. no. Because I want to enable stack-protector for the kernel
> (I have patches for that; all it needs is a 5 line gcc patch to make it
> work) as debug option at least (and if the perf impact isn't too bad,
> distros and security sensitive people can enable it always). 

Obviously, but at that time we should enable -fno-stack-protector vs 
-fstack-protector as appropriate.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/