Re: NO_HZ Kconfig rework

[Pavel Machek]

On Mon 2006-06-26 09:16:37, Daniel Walker wrote:
> I got NO_HZ working on ARM, but because the ARM tree already
> extensively implements NO_IDLE_HZ I had to make NO_HZ a
> completely seprate option.

So... what is the difference between NO_HZ and NO_IDLE_HZ?
							Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/