Re: [V9fs-developer] [Patch] Dead code in fs/9p/vfs_inode.c

[Russ Cox]

> coverity (id #971) found some dead code. In all error
> cases ret is NULL, so we can remove the if statement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@xxxxxx>
>
> --- linux-2.6.17-git11/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c.orig   2006-06-29 00:50:53.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.17-git11/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c        2006-06-29 00:51:11.000000000 +0200
> @@ -386,9 +386,6 @@ v9fs_inode_from_fid(struct v9fs_session_
>
>  error:
>         kfree(fcall);
> -       if (ret)
> -               iput(ret);
> -
>         return ERR_PTR(err);
>  }

What about when someone changes the code and does have ret != NULL here?
This seems like reasonable defensive programming to me.

Is the official LK policy that we can't have code that trips coverity
checks like this?

Russ
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/