Re: Network namespaces a path to mergable code.

[Eric W. Biederman]

Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:51:26AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Andrey Savochkin <saw@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > One possible option to resolve this question is to show 2 relatively short
>> > patches just introducing namespaces for sockets in 2 ways: with explicit
>> > function parameters and using implicit current context.
>> > Then people can compare them and vote.
>> > Do you think it's worth the effort?
>> 
>> Given that we have two strong opinions in different directions I think it
>> is worth the effort to resolve this.
>
> Do you have time to extract necessary parts of your old patch?
> Or you aren't afraid of letting me draft an alternative version of socket
> namespaces basing on your code? :)

I'm not terribly afraid.  I can always say you did it wrong. :)

I don't think I am going to have time today.  But since this conversation
is slowing down and we are to getting into the technical details.  
I will try and find some time.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/