Re: GFS2 and DLM

[Ingo Molnar]

* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Btw., i have just taken a 5 minute tour into XFS, and i found at 
> > least 5 other problems with the XFS code that are similar in nature 
> > to the ones you pointed out.
> 
> that's no reason to merge even more junk

the GFS2 ones were immediately addressed, 28 minutes and 27 seconds 
after they were pointed out:

  Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:57:56 +0100
  From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  Subject: Re: GFS2 and DLM

  Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:26:23 +0100
  From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>
  Subject: Re: GFS2 and DLM

> > (mostly useless wrappers around Linux functionality) Isnt this whole 
> > episode highly hypocritic to begin with?
> 
> lets not start calling names please...

well, i guess it's way too late for that:

> > Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Did anyone actually bother to review it?  It's huge and was in 
> > > pretty bad shapre when I looked last time.  Also in the -mm merge 
> > > writeup you guys said it's only scheduled for 2.6.19 so I didn't 
> > > even bother looking at the huge mess.

:-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/