Re: [PATCH] Fix cpufreq_{conservative,ondemand} compilation

[Krzysztof Halasa]

"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Thanks for the patch. Yes, I had missed this warning as some other patch
> in my local tree was adding cpu.h to cpufreq_ondemand.c

BTW: why can't we have "ondemand" (and others) by default (only
"performance" or "userspace")?
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/