Re: [PATCH] stop on cpu lost

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Pavel Machek wrote:
> That's what I'd prefer... as swsusp uses cpu hotplug.

Does it have to?  I presume this has been considered before, but what if 
the other CPUs were just idled for suspend rather than "removed"?  Or do 
you actually need to simulate a hot-remove to make sure they get 
suspended properly?  In general, the "hot remove as suspend" thing seems 
semantically awkward.

   J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/