Re: Why can't I set the priority of softirq-hrt? (Re: 2.6.17-rt1)

From: Esben Nielsen
Date: Wed Jun 21 2006 - 18:33:56 EST


On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 22:29 +0100, Esben Nielsen wrote:
Find an version against the code in -mm below. Not too much tested yet.

What if setscheduler is called from interrup context as in the hrt timers?

It simply gets stuff going, nothing else.

What I mean is that we will then do the full priority inheritance boost with interrupts off.

Before setscheduler() was O(1), now it is O(<lock depth of what ever lock the target task might be locked on>).

This is not a problem for your use of setscheduler() as the task involved only can be blocked on kernel mutexes, but when the function is used on a userspace process the lock depth can be deep.


Esben


tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/