[PATCH 3/25] x86_64 irq: Reenable migrating irqs to other cpus.

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Tue Jun 20 2006 - 18:34:58 EST


In the latest changes the code for migrating x86_64 irqs was dropped.
This reads it in a fashion that will work even if we change the
vector on level triggered irqs when we migrate them.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c
index 2e9f1cf..f50be45 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -1572,18 +1572,43 @@ static int ioapic_retrigger_vector(unsig
* races.
*/

-static void ack_apic(unsigned int vector)
+static void ack_apic(unsigned int irq)
{
ack_APIC_irq();
}

+static void ack_apic_edge(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ move_native_irq(irq);
+ ack_APIC_irq();
+}
+
+static void ack_apic_level(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ int do_unmask_irq = 0;
+ /* If we are moving the irq we need to mask it */
+ if (unlikely(irq_desc[irq].status & IRQ_MOVE_PENDING)) {
+ do_unmask_irq = 1;
+ mask_IO_APIC_irq(irq);
+ }
+ /* We must acknowledge the irq before we move it
+ * or the acknowledge will not propogate properly.
+ */
+ ack_APIC_irq();
+
+ /* Now we can move and renable the irq */
+ move_masked_irq(irq);
+ if (unlikely(do_unmask_irq))
+ unmask_IO_APIC_irq(irq);
+}
+
static struct irq_chip ioapic_chip __read_mostly = {
.name = "IO-APIC",
.startup = startup_ioapic_vector,
.mask = mask_ioapic_vector,
.unmask = unmask_ioapic_vector,
- .ack = ack_apic,
- .eoi = ack_apic,
+ .ack = ack_apic_edge,
+ .eoi = ack_apic_level,
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.set_affinity = set_ioapic_affinity_vector,
#endif
--
1.4.0.gc07e

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/