Re: NFSv3 client reordering RENAMEs

[Peter Staubach]

Janne Karhunen wrote:

> On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:44, Peter Staubach wrote:
>
>  
>
> > > really expect RENAME to be reordered as mv is generally considered
> > > atomic. That, and RFC 1813 mandates RENAME to be atomic. Is this a
> > > known thing and do you guys consider this feature or a bug?
> > >      
> > Can you construct a testcase which exhibits this behavior?
> >    
>
> Possibly .. if someone first acks that this indeed would be
> considered as bug and not as a feature :/ 

Yes, I believe that this would be considered to be a bug...

      ps
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/