Re: genirq: fasteoi change for retrigger

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 10:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ingo, Thomas.
> > 
> > Would you be ok with a small change to the fasteoi handler that
> > 
> >  - If the interrupt happens while disabled, rather than just doing goto
> > out, also mark it pending
> >  - In the normal handling code path, clear pending.
> > 
> > That would allow some sort of soft-disable to work with fasteoi.
> > 
> > My issue here is on Cell. I have a very strange interrupt controller 
> > that can't mask interrupts.
> 
> sure, it looks reasonable to me. Thomas?

No objections.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/