Re: genirq

[Daniel Walker]

On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 16:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> there hasnt been any real problem since the MSI one. The core bits are 
> rather stable. The patch-queue had positive input from the maintainers 
> of the two architectures with the most complex IRQ hardware (arm and 
> ppc*), and that's reassuring. But in any case, other architectures are 
> not affected at all (sans brow paperbag build bugs and typos), their 
> __do_IRQ() handling remains unchanged. So i'd like to see this in 
> 2.6.18. (there a good deal of stuff we have ontop of genirq)

There was a problem reported by Kevin Hillman , the -v5 version was not
functional on ARM omap boards .. Was that handled already in -v6?

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/