Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq()

[Alan Cox]

On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:37:01AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Couldn't it be possible to have the misrouted irq function mark the
> DISABLED_IRQ handlers as IRQ_PENDING?  Then have the enable_irq that
> actually enables the irq to call the handlers with interrupts disabled
> if the IRQ_PENDING is set?

We still have the ambiguity with disable_irq. Really we need to have
disable_irq_handler(irq, handler)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/