Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc5 7/8] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives

From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Sat Jun 03 2006 - 17:10:35 EST


Pavel Machek wrote:
>>From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
>>+ memleak_debug_not_leak(res);
>
> I'd suggest some shorter/more generic name.
>
> not_freed(res); ?
>
> alloc_forever(res); ?

It's true that the names are a bit long ("debug" is even superfluous). I
would, however, keep the memleak_ prefix as I think it makes the code
clearer (i.e. the function belongs to a certain part of the kernel).

Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/