Re: [PATCH RFC] smt nice introduces significant lock contention

[Con Kolivas]

On Saturday 03 June 2006 10:08, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> I know what smt nice is doing, and it is fine to have.  I'm simply
> proposing the following patch, on top of last roll up patch.

It's still relative breakage of the semantics but I'm willing to concede that 
it will only help a very small proportion of the time with the largest 
timeslices and is in the fastpath.

-- 
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/