Re: [PATCH] klibc

[maximilian attems]

On Thu, 01 June 2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Jun 2006, Bob Picco wrote:
> >>  
> >> -#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
> >> +#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__) && \
> >> +	!defined(__powerpc64__)
> > 
> > Why not just !defined(__LP64__) ?
> 
> _BITSIZE == 64 is really the right formula... if I remember correctly, there were some 
> 64-bit platforms (Alpha?) which didn't conform, though.  I will look at this later today.
> 
> 	-hpa

indeed aboves line contains an mistake by an earlier patch of mine.

-#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__sparc_v9__)
+#if !defined(__x86_64__) && !defined(__ia64__) && !defined(__arch64__)

is atm needed to get statfs right on sparc.

-- 
maks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/