Re: [PATCH RFC] smt nice introduces significant lock contention

[Con Kolivas]

On Friday 02 June 2006 13:04, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Sure, you have the hack lock. Actually we can just trylock and if it fails
> remove it from the sibling_map and go to out_unlock without a separate
> trylock_smt_cpus function entirely...

I mean go to out_unlock if the sibling_map is empty sorry.

-- 
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/