[PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter

From: Jesper Juhl
Date: Sat May 06 2006 - 22:34:57 EST


The Coverity checker spotted that we may leak 'hold' in
net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c::checkentry() when the following
is true :
if (!curr_table->status_proc) {
...
if(!curr_table) {
...
return 0; <-- here we leak.
Simply moving an existing vfree(hold); up a bit avoids the possible leak.


(please keep me on CC when replying since I'm not subscribed
to netfilter-devel)


Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
---

net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-2.6.17-rc3-git12-orig/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c 2006-05-07 03:25:38.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc3-git12/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c 2006-05-07 04:16:26.000000000 +0200
@@ -821,6 +821,7 @@ checkentry(const char *tablename,
/* Create our proc 'status' entry. */
curr_table->status_proc = create_proc_entry(curr_table->name, ip_list_perms, proc_net_ipt_recent);
if (!curr_table->status_proc) {
+ vfree(hold);
printk(KERN_INFO RECENT_NAME ": checkentry: unable to allocate for /proc entry.\n");
/* Destroy the created table */
spin_lock_bh(&recent_lock);
@@ -845,7 +846,6 @@ checkentry(const char *tablename,
spin_unlock_bh(&recent_lock);
vfree(curr_table->time_info);
vfree(curr_table->hash_table);
- vfree(hold);
vfree(curr_table->table);
vfree(curr_table);
return 0;


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/