Re: [PATCH 5/13: eCryptfs] Header declarations

[Michael Thompson]

On 5/4/06, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/4/06, Phillip Hellewell <phillip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +
> > +#define ecryptfs_printk(type, fmt, arg...) \
> > +        __ecryptfs_printk(type "%s: " fmt, __FUNCTION__, ## arg);
> > +void __ecryptfs_printk(const char *fmt, ...);
>
> Why not plain printk?

Originally, ecryptfs_printk was using a verbosity level, which is why
there was a custom call wrapping printk. This is no longer the case,
and the eCryptfs developers are currently looking at this, and are
planning to remove the bulk of printks.

Thanks,
Mike

--
Michael C. Thompson <mcthomps@xxxxxxxxxx>
Software-Engineer, IBM LTC Security
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/