Re: [PATCH] fix x86 microcode driver handling of multiplematching revisions

From: Jan Beulich
Date: Thu May 04 2006 - 03:59:11 EST


Tigran,

>First of all, I would like to know why is it that you have several chunks
>in your microcode data which correspond to the same CPU? In the normal
>data files which come from Intel there are no such chunks. Are you
>concatenating the new files with the old (just in case the new update is
>no good, so you can fall back to the old)?

the update file is the one in microcode_ctl-1.13. CPUID 0x00000f48 can
be found twice in that file, once with product code bits 0x0000005f and
a second time with 0x00000002. Obviously these overlap for CPUs with
product code 1 (testing bit mask 0x00000002), which is what is the case
for the (Paxville) system I saw the ill behavior on.

Thanks, Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/