Re: [RFC] Advanced XIP File System

From: Josh Boyer
Date: Wed May 03 2006 - 20:22:41 EST


On 5/3/06, Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Erm, why was one built on NAND and one on NOR? You're comparing
> apples to oranges now.

The assumption I'm making is that if you don't use XIP that NAND
becomes an economically attractive and technically feasible option to
store the code. The idea was to dive into the tradeoffs of the
options. It reflects what I believe is the reality of what design
decisions are being looked at by customers of my current employer.

Comparing apples and oranges is appropriate when one is investigating
spherical fruits :)

Heh, ok. That makes sense if you're investigating the economic options.

josh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/