Re: 2.6.17-rc2-mm1

[Andy Whitcroft]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 May 2006 09:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
>>>>><EOE>new stack 0 (0 0 0 10082 10)
>>>>
>>>>Looks like <rubbish> <SS> <RSP> <RFLAGS> <CS> to me, ...
>>>
>>>Hmm, right.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Hmm weird. There isn't anything resembling an exception frame at the top of the
>>>>>stack.  No idea how this could happen.
>>>>
>>>>... which is a valid frame where the stack pointer was corrupted before the exception occurred. One more printed
>>
>>item
>>
>>>>(or rather, starting items at estack_end[-1]) would allow at least seeing what RIP this came from.
>>>
>>>Any can you add that please and check? 
>>
>>???
> 
> 
> Sorry I meant to write Andy but left out the d :-( - he did the testing
> on the machine that showed the problem.

Heh, happy to do the testing.  Just to make sure I am doing the right
thing, you want an entire stack frame dropped out in the case that
SS/RSP are 0; so we get the RIP.

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/