Re: Compiling C++ modules

[Al Viro]

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:02:55PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Hey, I agree 100%, except for the last 6 words :) C++ is the very worst 
> language I know in terms of badly thought out features, internal 
> inconsistencies, ways to shoot one's feet off, and general ugliness. It 
> will require _very_ tight control to avoid parts of the kernel going off 
> in mutually incompatible directions.
> 
> But I think that the control is there; and if C++ is introduced slowly, 
> one feature at a time, it can be kept sane. And I think there is 
> definitely a payoff to be won out of a switch.

You are far too optimistic.  In the best case it'll end up with higher
artificial entry barrier for contributors.  In the worst (and much more
realistic) the crap will leak all over the tree in addition to the
already present classes of bugs.

"Everyone has his pet subset/extension" is a killer for anything that isn't
done by 5-6 people, or, at least reviewed by 5-6 people who really can
read through _all_ incoming code.  For something like Linux kernel...
forget it.  It's far outside of the area where that would work.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/