Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix die_lock nesting

[Andi Kleen]

On Wednesday 26 April 2006 22:53, Corey Minyard wrote:


> The oops_begin() function in x86_64 would only conditionally claim
> the die_lock if the call is nested, but oops_end() would always
> release the spinlock. This patch adds a nest count for the die lock
> so that the release of the lock is only done on the final oops_end().

Merged thanks.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/