Re: [PATCH] catch valid mem range at onlining memory

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Apr 28 2006 - 19:45:33 EST


On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:34:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This patch allows hot-add memory which is not aligned to section.
> > Based on linux-2.6.17-rc2-mm1 + memory hotadd ioresource register patch.
> >
> > iomem resource patch is here.
> > http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0604.3/1188.html
> >
> > Now, hot-added memory has to be aligned to section size.
> > Considering big section sized archs, this is not useful.
> >
> > When hot-added memory is registerd as iomem resoruce by iomem resource patch,
> > we can make use of that information to detect valid memory range.
> >
> > Note: With this, not-aligned memory can be registerd. To allow hot-add
> > memory with holes, we have to do more work around add_memory().
> > (It doesn't allows add memory to already existing mem section.)
> >
> >
>
> Looks sane, thanks.
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> > +/*
> > + * Finds the lowest memory reosurce exists within [res->start.res->end)
> > + * the caller must specify res->start, res->end, res->flags.
> > + * If found, returns 0, res is overwritten, if not found, returns -1.
> > + */
> > +int find_next_system_ram(struct resource *res)
> > +{
> > + u64 start, end;
> > + struct resource *p;
> > +
> > + BUG_ON(!res);
> > +
> > + start = res->start;
> > + end = res->end;
> > +
> > + read_lock(&resource_lock);
> > + for( p = iomem_resource.child; p ; p = p->sibling) {
> > + /* system ram is just marked as IORESOURCE_MEM */
> > + if (p->flags != res->flags)
> > + continue;
> > + if (p->start > end) {
> > + p = NULL;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + if (p->start >= start)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + read_unlock(&resource_lock);
> > + if (!p)
> > + return -1;
> > + /* copy data */
> > + res->start = p->start;
> > + res->end = p->end;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif
>
> This all looks fairly (but trivially) dependent upon the 64-bit-resource
> patches in Greg's tree. Greg, were you planning on merging them in the
> post-2.6.17 flood?

Yes, I was, unless there are any objections to me doing this?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/