PCI init vs. memory init
From: Linas Vepstas
Date: Fri Apr 28 2006 - 19:04:01 EST
Paul,
I'd previously reported a problem where the PCI subsystem
was getting inited before the memory subsystem. In the unusual
case of an EEH failure, this resulted in a crash in kmalloc,
which I hacked around with a if(!mem_init_done).
You mentioned that the sequence of inits seemed wrong, that the
PCI init should be done later, after the memory init. I think
I agree; but when I took a very very quick look at the code, there
was no obvious hook in later init to move the PCI init over to.
Are you pursuing this further? Should I dig into it? Any bright
ideas? Am I missing something obvious?
There are several spots in in the powerpc PCI init code where
a boot_mem alloc is used instead of kmalloc, and this boot_mem is
then hacked around in the case of a PCI hotplug remove. It would
be nice to fix this...
--linas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/