Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller

[Mike Galbraith]

On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 22:55 +0900, Hirokazu Takahashi wrote:
> I think you can introduce some threshold to estimate whether
> a process should be treated as an interactive process or not
> while vanilla kernel defines it statically.

Hmm.  What do you mean by static?  It is dynamic to my eyes.  The entire
mechanism is a dynamic priority mechanism.

If you know of anything that might help differentiate interactive tasks,
please speak up :)  It's really a bugger of a problem.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/