Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller

[Con Kolivas]

On Friday 28 April 2006 22:07, MAEDA Naoaki wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > I agree with Mike here. It's either global resource management or it
> > isn't. If one user is using all interactive tasks and the other user none
> > it's unfair resource management.
>
> My intention was not to hurt interactive task's response, but it seems
> that just ignoring interactive tasks is not good. I'll consider
> regulating interactive tasks also.

I appreciate the gesture of concern over interactive tasks :-) Unfortunately 
it doesn't change the fact that interactive tasks can also consume large 
proportions of the resources, and that any interactivity estimator will get 
it wrong on occasion and flag a non interactive task as interactive.

-- 
-ck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/