Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller

[MAEDA Naoaki]

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:41:09 +0200
Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 16:26 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:59:49 +0200
> > Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > You simply cannot ignore interactive tasks.  At the very least, you have
> > > to disallow requeue if the resource limit has been exceeded, otherwise,
> > > this patch set is non-functional.
> > 
> > It can be easily implemented on top of the current code. Do you know a good
> > sample program that is judged as interactive but consumes lots of cpu?
> 
> X sometimes, Mozilla sometimes,... KDE konsole when scrolling,...
> anything that on average sleeps more than roughly 5% of it's slice can
> starve you to death either alone, or (worse) with peers.

They are true interactive tasks, aren't they? 
Oh! I should say "that is not interactive, but judged as interactive
and consumes lots of cpu". 

Thanks,
MAEDA Naoaki
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/