Re: [PATCH] Handle CONFIG_LBD and CONFIG_LSF in one place

[Andrew Morton]

Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 06:34:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >  CONFIG_LBD and CONFIG_LSF are spread into asm/types.h for no particularly
> > >  good reason.  Centralising the definition in linux/types.h means that arch
> > >  maintainers don't need to bother adding it, as well as fixing the problem
> > >  with x86-64 users being asked to make a decision that has absolutely no
> > >  effect.  The H8/300 porters seem particularly confused since I'm not aware
> > >  of any microcontrollers that need to support 2TB filesystems these days.
> > 
> > x86_64:
> > 
> > include/linux/types.h:137: error: conflicting types for 'sector_t'
> > include/asm/types.h:51: error: previous declaration of 'sector_t' was here
> 
> is the conflicting patch available somewhere so i can put a patch in for
> it?

I don't think there was any conflicting patch.  I have no other patches
touching include/linux/types.h or include/asm-x86_64/types.h.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/