Re: [PATCH] likely cleanup: remove unlikely for kfree(NULL)

[Pekka J Enberg]

On 4/25/06, Hua Zhong <hzhong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> > > index e6ef9bd..0fbc854 100644
> > > --- a/mm/slab.c
> > > +++ b/mm/slab.c
> > > @@ -3380,7 +3380,7 @@ void kfree(const void *objp)
> > >         struct kmem_cache *c;
> > >         unsigned long flags;
> > >
> > > -       if (unlikely(!objp))
> > > +       if (!objp)
> > >                 return;

> On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:30 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > NAK. Fix the callers instead.

On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> eh dude... they are being fixed... to remove the NULL check :)

Most of which are on error paths. The problem we're seeing is in handful 
of fastpath offenders which should be fixed either by re-design or adding 
the NULL check along with a big fat comment like Andrew is doing.

					Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/