Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack

[Sam Vilain]

Serge E. Hallyn wrote:

>>>Can we please suggest a syscall interface?
>>>      
>>>
>
>Eric,
>
>Did you have any ideas for how you'd want to interface to look?  Are
>you fine with the vserver approach?
>  
>

Eric has said that his understanding was that syscall switches (ie,
syscalls with subcommands) were bad form.

I understand the concern, but I think while it's still in prototype
stages, that it's a sensible and pragmatic approach. Once individual
subcommands are "finalised" then they can be split out into a seperate
syscall, and any level of backwards compatibility can be maintained by
whoever needs it.

>>What was wrong with the method of the one I posted / extracted from the
>>Linux-VServer project? I mean, apart from the baggage which I intend to
>>remove for the next posting.
>>    
>>
>
>Are you working on a next posting?
>  
>

I've been a bit backlogged of late. I'll put some time towards it this
week, of course patches are always welcome and will find a home on utsl :).

Sam.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/