Re: C++ pushback

[Avi Kivity]

Martin Mares wrote:
>   
> > That seems to be a case against writing functions.
> >
> > Why is a C function acceptable where a C++ constructor isn't?
> >     
>
> Because examining a single constructor is not enough -- you need to
> check constructors of all objects contained within the object you
> initialize.
>
> Calling a C function is simple and explicit -- a quick glance over
> the code is enough to tell what gets called.
>
>   
No, you need to check all the functions it calls as well.

But I agree that C is more explicit than C++.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/